M5: Cognitive Offloading

The Question

When AI makes thinking easier, are you learning more or offloading your growth?

Warm-up:

[Brief description of game]

The Scenario

Your school implemented a new literacy curriculum this year.

You have:

• Teacher feedback (mixed reactions)

• Student outcome data (modest gains, variable by class)

• Classroom observation notes

Your decision: Keep it? Modify it? Overhaul it?

Pass 1: Without AI

Analyze the data.

Make a recommendation.

Write down your reasoning.

Pass 2: With AI

Same data. Same decision.

Now use AI:

• Paste the data

• Ask it to help you think

• See what changes

What Changed?

Did AI make analysis faster?

Did it change your actual judgment?

Where did AI shine? Where did you have to decide?

What part of this decision felt like it required your expertise?

The Pattern Across Fields

Medical Diagnosis

Analysis: AI flags patterns, suggests possibilities

Judgment: Choosing treatment requires knowing the patient, weighing tradeoffs, understanding what they can tolerate

Safe to offload: analysis

Risky to offload: the call

Therapy/Counseling

Analysis: organize notes, suggest frameworks, draft plans

Judgment: reading the room, deciding when to push and when to hold, building the relationship

Safe to offload: structure

Risky to offload: the relationship and the call

Teacher Evaluation

Analysis: aggregate data on lesson quality, student feedback, outcomes

Judgment: is this teacher ready for leadership, or need support, or time to move on?

Safe to offload: data work

Risky to offload: knowing them over time and deciding

Your Context: Education Policy & Leadership

Analysis: survey data, theme patterns, outlier flagging

Judgment: what should we prioritize next? What can we afford? What serves our mission?

Safe to offload: the research

Risky to offload: the decision that requires your values and context

The Line

Analysis, pattern-finding, option generation: safe to offload or delegate to AI

Judgment calls requiring you to weigh values, context, and stakes: categorically different

The question isn't "should I use AI?" It's "which part am I comfortable handing off?"

Cut the Bullshit

Work Time: Your Human-AI Collaboration Project

30 minutes

Haven't done it yet? Work on it live with AI. I'm circulating.

Already done it? Draft your reflection.

Either way: notice where you lean on AI and where you pause and do your own thinking.

Tool Brainstorm

What cognitive tasks would you feel comfortable offloading?

[CLUSTER ON BOARD: data analysis, research, memo drafting, survey design, scheduling, etc.]

What would you never offload?

[CLUSTER: judgment calls, stakeholder conversations, strategic decisions, etc.]

The Hunt

Pick one task from "comfortable to offload" that connects to your work.

Find a real tool that handles it.

12 minutes. Pairs.

Field Journal Entry

Write:

• One tool I found

• What task it handles

• One judgment call I'd never let it make for me

This is your entry for the week.

Share Out

Tool + task + context

Just the data. No long stories.

Builds our class resource list.

Your Closing Stance

One cognitive task I'd offload to AI in my work is ___.

One I'd never offload is ___.

The difference is ___.

The Takeaway

You can design how you use AI.

The question isn't binary—it's not "use AI or don't."

It's "which part of my thinking do I want AI to handle, and which part is non-negotiable?"

Build that intentionality.